Hypothetical.
You're job interview is at 8:00am tomorrow morning, and being the careful person you are, you set your alarm for 7:00 pm "the next morning." Wake up at 10am and realize, YOU DID IT WRONG.
I bet you'd like to go back and fix it, and wish you had the opportunity to do so, right?
This is why I just don't get it. Listen. It's 2010. We have the ability to use instant replay. In ALL sports, on ALL levels. I simply don't understand what the problem is with getting it right. Why not use replay? You might make the assumption that umpires or referee's would be useless, and good/bad umpires would be nonexistent anymore. And? Hire a crew of umps to go out there and call it like they see it, and if they get it wrong, big deal. It takes all of 15 seconds for a scorer to view the play and make a decision. Then, someone upstairs can call down and let them know. Simple. The better umpires can get it right most of the time and keep the games running smoothly. I just don't seem to understand what's wrong with getting it right. I don't think this guy does either. Balls and strikes? They have always been judgement calls and always will be judgement calls. But for safe/out, HR/Not, catch/no-catch, is it really that difficult to just get it right, and not have to worry about human error deciding games, championships, and most of all, history. It's about time we man up and admit that man isn't perfect, and a little help from technology isn't always a bad thing.
And don't even get me started on the lack of proper officiating/replay in soccer. Ask Frank Lampard.
Oh, and by the way, the Little League World Series just started using replay and implemented coaches challenges into the game; figures it takes 12 year old kids to set the example for revenue-earning professional sports. Sigh.